PN 21-38 NAB-2019-60444-M30 (A & S Smith Development Inc - Breezy Point Marina/Maintenance Dredging)

USACE
Published Sept. 24, 2021
Expiration date: 10/15/2021

                       Public Notice                    

U.S. Army Corps              In Reply To
of Engineers                     NAB-2019-60444-M30 (A & S Smith Development Inc - Breezy Point

Baltimore District          Marina/Maintenance Dredging)      

PN 21-38                            Comment Period: September 24, 2021 to October 15, 2021 

THE PURPOSE OF THIS PUBLIC NOTICE IS TO SOLICIT COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC REGARDING THE
WORK DESCRIBED BELOW. NO DECISION HAS BEEN MADE AS TO WHETHER OR NOT AUTHORIZATION
WILL BE GRANTED AT THIS TIME.

This District has received an application for a Department of the Army permit pursuant to Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344),as described below:

APPLICANT: 

A&S Smith Development, LLC
Breezy Point Marina
Ms. Laura Hershfield
48 South River Road, South
Edgewater, Maryland 21037

Mr. Mike Plitt
1411 Teal Lane
Fredrick, Maryland 21703

WATERWAY AND LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED WORK:  The proposed project is located in the Chesapeake Bay at the Neeld Estates Beach, Huntingtown, Calvert County, Maryland. (38.614483N; -76.51156W)

OVERALL PROJECT PURPOSE:  Navigational access and beach nourishment.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION:  The applicant wishes to modify a previously issued permit to include the placement of the dredge spoil onto the adjacent property beach. The applicant proposes to place approximately 2,400 cubic yards of dredged material consisting of sand along 700 linear feet of shoreline to extend no more than 25 feet channelward of the existing bulkheaded shoreline impacting approximately 17,500 square feet of intertidal beach habitat. The dredged material will be pumped directly from the dredging vessel at the Breezy Point Marina through an approximate 1,200 foot long 12-inch discharge outfall pipe within the Breezy Point Marina Harbor to the discharge point within the Chesapeake Bay as shown on the attached plans. There are no proposed changes to the approved dredging location and depths. All excess material will be placed within the approved upload disposal site at Breezy Point Marina. Please refer to the table below for a summary of aquatic resource impacts. See attached plans.

EFFECTS ON AQUATIC RESOURCES:

Activity (i.e. culvert)

Open Water/Beach Habitat

Authority
(Section 10/404/408)

Linear Feet

Square Feet

Beach Nourishment

700

17,500

10/404

 

LEAD FEDERAL AGENCY:  The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, as the lead federal agency, is responsible for all coordination pursuant to applicable federal authorities.

APPLICANT’S PROPOSED AVOIDANCE, MINIMIZATION, AND COMPENSATORY MITIGATION:  The applicant proposes to place the sand fill channelward of the existing bulkhead and reestablish portions of the historical beach width. Since 2012, the beach has eroded approximately 25 feet and during high tide the beach is nonexistent in front of the bulkhead. Based upon the 1972 Maryland Department of the Environment’s wetland maps the beach was approximately 65 feet channelward of the location of the bulkhead. The applicant is proposing to use a turbidity curtain during the placement of the material. No mitigation is proposed for the proposed placement project.

CORPS EVALUATION REQUIREMENTS:  This project will be evaluated pursuant to Corps Regulatory Program Regulations (33 CFR Parts 320-332). The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable impacts, including cumulative impacts of the proposed activity on the public interest. That decision will reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of important resources. The benefit, which reasonable may be expected to accrue from the proposal, must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. All factors, which may be relevant to the proposal will be considered, including the cumulative effects thereof; among those are conservation, economic, aesthetics, general environmental concerns, wetlands, cultural values, fish and wildlife values, flood hazards, flood plain values, land use, navigation, shoreline erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water quality, energy needs, safety, food and fiber production, mineral needs, and consideration of property ownership and in general, the needs and welfare of the people. The evaluation of the impact of this project will also include application of the Clean Water Act Section 404(b)(1) Guidelines promulgated by the Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

ENDANGERED SPECIES:  A preliminary review of this application indicates that the proposed work will have no effect on federally listed threatened or endangered species or their critical habitat, pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, as amended. As the evaluation of this application continues, additional information may become available which could modify this preliminary determination.

ESSENTIAL FISH HABITAT:  The Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (MSFCMA), as amended by the Sustainable Fisheries Act of 1996 (Public Law 04-267), requires all Federal agencies to consult with the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) on all actions, or proposed actions, permitted, funded, or undertaken by the agency that may adversely affect Essential Fish Habitat (EFH), including species of concern, life cycle habitat, or Habitat Areas of Particular Concern. The project site lies in or adjacent to EFH as described under MSFCMA for managed species under the MSFCMA. The Baltimore District has made a preliminary determination that the project will not have a substantial adverse effect on EFH. The Baltimore District has made a preliminary determination that mitigative measures are not required to minimize adverse effects on EFH at this time. This determination may be modified if additional information indicates otherwise.

HISTORIC RESOURCES:  Pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and applicable guidance, the Corps has reviewed the latest published version of the National Register of Historic Places and initially determined that no registered properties listed as eligible for inclusion, therein, are located at the site of the proposed work. The Corps has made the preliminary determination that the proposed project would have no effecton historic properties. The Corps final eligibility and effect determination will be based on coordination with the State Historic Preservation Office as appropriate and required, and with full consideration given to the proposed undertaking’s potential direct and indirect effects on historic properties within the Corps’ identified permit area.

TRIBAL RESOURCES:  Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act also requires federal agencies to consult with federally recognized American Indian tribes that attach religious and cultural significance to historic properties that may be affected by the agency’s undertaking. Corps Tribal Consultation Policy mandates an open, timely, meaningful, collaborative, and effective deliberative communication process that emphasizes trust, respect, and shared responsibility. The policy further emphasizes that, to the extent practicable and permitted by law, consultation works toward mutual consensus and begins at the earliest planning stages, before decisions are made and actions taken. The Corps final eligibility and effect determination will be based on coordination with interested tribes, in accordance with the Corps current tribal standard operating procedures as appropriate and required, and with full consideration given to the proposed undertaking’s potential direct and indirect effects on tribal resources.

MODIFICATION OF CIVIL WORKS PROJECTS:  33 USC 408 (SECTION 408):  All Section 408 proposals will be coordinated internally at USACE. The Section 408 decision will be issued along with the Section 404 and/or Section 10 decision. Please see the following link for more information regarding Section 408:  https://www.nab.usace.army.mil/section408/.

WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION:  The applicant is required to obtain a water quality certification in accordance with Section 401 of the Clean Water Act.  

COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS:  Where applicable, the applicant has certified in this application that the proposed activity complies with and will be conducted in a manner consistent with the approved Coastal Zone Management (CZM) Program. By this public notice, we are requesting the State concurrence or objection to the applicant’s consistency statement.

The applicant must obtain any State or local government permits which may be required.

SUBMISSION OF COMMENTS:  The Corps of Engineers is soliciting comments from the public; Federal, State, and local agencies and officials; Indian Tribes; and other interested parties in order to consider and evaluate the impacts of this proposed activity. Any comments received will be considered by the Corps of Engineers to determine whether to issue, modify, condition or deny a permit for this proposal. To make this decision, comments are used to assess impacts on endangered species, historic properties, water quality, general environmental effects, and the other public interest factors listed above. Comments are used in the preparation of an Environmental Assessment and/or an Environmental Impact Statement pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act. Comments provided will become part of the public record for this action and are subject to release to the public through the Freedom of Information Act. Comments are also used to determine the need for a public hearing and to determine the overall public interest of the proposed activity.

Written comments concerning the work described above related to the factors listed above or other pertinent factors must be received by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Baltimore District within the comment period specified above through postal mail at the address below or electronic submission to the project manager email address below. Written comments should reference the Application Number NAB-2019-60444.

PUBLIC HEARING REQUESTS:  Any person who has an interest which may be adversely affected by the issuance of this permit may request a public hearing. The request, which must be in writing, must be received within the comment period as specified above to receive consideration. Also, it must clearly set forth the interest which may be adversely affected by this activity and the manner in which the interest may be adversely affected.  The public hearing request may be submitted by electronic mail or mailed to the following address: 

Ms. Erica Schmidt
Erica.Schmidt@usace.army.mil
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Baltimore District
Regulatory Branch
2 Hopkins Plaza
Baltimore, Maryland 21201

It is requested that you communicate this information concerning the proposed work to any persons known by you to be interested, who did not receive a copy of this notice.

General information regarding the Corps’ permitting process can be found on our website at https://www.nab.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory.aspx. This public notice has been prepared in accordance with Corps implementing regulations at 33 CFR 325.3. If you have any questions concerning this specific project or would like to request a paper copy of this public notice, please contact Ms. Erica Schmidt at Erica.Schmidt@usace.army.mil. This public notice is issued by the Chief, Regulatory Branch.