PN-23-09 NAB-2022-60834 (MCBP Tizzard Island/Coastal Resiliency)

USACE
Published March 2, 2023
Expiration date: 4/1/2023

                        Public Notice
U.S. Army Corps              In Reply to Application Number
of Engineers                    NAB-2022-60834 (MCBP Tizzard Island/Coastal Resiliency)

Baltimore District
PN-23-09                          Comment Period: March 2 to April 1, 2023  

THE PURPOSE OF THIS PUBLIC NOTICE IS TO INFORM INTERESTED PARTIES OF THE PROPOSED ACTIVITY AND TO SOLICIT COMMENTS. NO DECISION HAS BEEN MADE AS TO WHETHER OR NOT A PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED AT THIS TIME.

This District has received an application for a Department of the Army permit pursuant to Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344),as described below:

APPLICANT:

                              Maryland Coastal Bays Program
                              Attn: Mr. Kevin Smith
                              8219 Stephen Decatur Highway
                              Berlin, Maryland 21811

WATERWAY AND LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED WORK:

The work is in Chincoteague Bay on Tizzard Island, located outside of Girdletree, Worcester County, Maryland (Latitude: 38.077222°N; Longitude: -75.334167°W)

OVERALL PROJECT PURPOSE:

To provide shoreline erosion control, to establish/enhance habitat, and to provide coastal resiliency on Tizzard Island, Worcester County, Maryland.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

The applicant proposes, in accordance with the attached plans, to stabilize a total of approximately 5,167 linear feet of eroding shoreline using a living shoreline design employing a series of headland control breakwater structures, all within an approximately 172,891 square foot (sf) (3.9-acre) impact area as follows:

  1. To construct a total of six (6) shore connected headland control breakwater structures as follows: Breakwater 1 measures approximately 208-feet (ft) long by 32-ft wide, not to exceed 240 ft channelward of the approximate mean high water (MHW) shoreline; Breakwater 2 measures approximately 190-ft long by 33-ft wide, not to exceed 214 ft channelward of the approximate MHW shoreline; Breakwater 3 measures approximately 293-ft long by 39-ft wide, not to exceed 210 ft channelward of the approximate MHW shoreline; Breakwater 4 measures approximately 465-ft long by 39-ft wide, not to exceed 422 ft channelward of the approximate MHW shoreline; Breakwater 5 measures approximately 408-ft long by 39-ft wide, not to exceed 364 ft channelward of the approximate MHW shoreline; and Breakwater 6 measures approximately 163-ft long by 39-ft wide, not to exceed 122 ft channelward of the approximate MHW shoreline.
     
  2. To emplace a total of approximately 10,259 cubic yards of a sand/woodchip mix and a well-graded sand/cobble mix for tombolo/habitat construction; all within an approximate 86,336 sf area; and to stabilize with approximately 76,479 sf of low marsh vegetation (Spartina alterniflora) and 33,053 sf of high marsh vegetation (S. patens), all within the area of each of the six above-mentioned breakwaters.
     
  3. To install three channel blocks to reduce saltwater intrusion as follows:
    Channel Block 1 measuring approximately 95-ft long by 6-ft wide; Channel Block 2 measuring approximately 63-ft long by 6-ft wide; and Channel Block 3 measuring approximately 22-ft long by 6-ft wide.

All work is proposed in accordance with the attached plans prepared by Underwood and Associates, dated February 6, 2022.

EFFECTS ON AQUATIC RESOURCES:

Proposed Activity

Aquatic Resource Impact (sf)

 Aquatic Resource Type

Authority

Breakwaters Structures

62,358

Open Water/Intertidal

Section 10/404

Sand Tombolo’s/Low Marsh

76,479

Sand Tombolo’s/High Marsh

33,053

Channel Blocks

1,001

Total:

172,891

 

 

 

LEAD FEDERAL AGENCY:

The United States Army Corps of Engineers (Corps), as the lead federal agency, is responsible for all coordination pursuant to applicable federal authorities.

APPLICANT’S PROPOSED AVOIDANCE, MINIMIZATION, AND COMPENSATORY MITIGATION:

As part of the planning process for the proposed project, steps were taken to ensure avoidance and minimization of impacts to aquatic resources to the maximum extent practicable based on the existing site conditions. The applicant proposes to avoid and minimize impacts by designing the headland breakwaters to be of the minimum channelward extent necessary to provide reduced wave energy and erosion rates. In addition, the applicant considered historical resource analysis and the Virginia Institute of Marine Sciences (VIMS) submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV) maps to guide the proposed shoreline stabilization/resiliency design. Proposed shoreline erosion protection measures along the south facing shorelines were redesigned and not included in this proposal to reduce channelward encroachment and to avoid SAV impacts.

No compensatory mitigation is proposed. No wetlands would be impacted and approximately 7,266 sf of 2016-2020 mapped SAV would be impacted as a result of the proposed project based on existing site conditions and Corps review of SAV mapping data available from the VIMS for the most recent 5 years of mapped coverage data. The project would result in the establishment of approximately 76,479 sf of low marsh habitat and 33,053 sf of high marsh habitat channelward of the approximate mean high water shoreline.

CORPS EVALUATION REQUIREMENTS:

This project will be evaluated pursuant to Corps Regulatory Program Regulations (33 CFR Parts 320-332). The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable impacts, including cumulative impacts of the proposed activity on the public interest. That decision will reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of important resources. The benefit, which reasonable may be expected to accrue from the proposal, must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. All factors, which may be relevant to the proposal will be considered, including the cumulative effects thereof; among those are conservation, economic, aesthetics, general environmental concerns, wetlands, cultural values, fish and wildlife values, flood hazards, flood plain values, land use, navigation, shoreline erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water quality, energy needs, safety, food and fiber production, mineral needs, and consideration of property ownership and in general, the needs and welfare of the people. The evaluation of the impact of this project will also include application of the Clean Water Act Section 404(b)(1) Guidelines promulgated by the Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency.

ENDANGERED SPECIES:

A preliminary review of this application indicates that the proposed work is not likely to adversely affect federally listed threatened or endangered species or their critical habitat, pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, as amended. As the evaluation of this application continues, additional information may become available which could modify this preliminary determination.

ESSENTIAL FISH HABITAT:

The Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (MSFCMA), as amended by the Sustainable Fisheries Act of 1996 (Public Law 04-267), requires all federal agencies to consult with the National Marine Fisheries Service on all actions, or proposed actions, permitted, funded, or undertaken by the agency that may adversely affect Essential Fish Habitat (EFH), including species of concern, life cycle habitat, or Habitat Areas of Particular Concern. The project site lies in or adjacent to EFH as described under MSFCMA for managed species under the MSFCMA. The Baltimore District has made a preliminary determination that the project will not have a substantial adverse effect on EFH. The proposed work would impact approximately 7,266 sf of SAV bed mapped in 2020. The Baltimore District has made a preliminary determination that mitigative measures are not required to minimize adverse effects on EFH at this time. This determination may be modified if additional information indicates otherwise.

HISTORIC RESOURCES:

Pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and applicable guidance, the Corps has reviewed the latest published version of the National Register of Historic Places and initially determined that no registered properties listed as eligible for inclusion, therein, are located at the site of the proposed work. The Corps has made the preliminary determination that the proposed project would have no effect on historic properties. The Corps final eligibility and effect determination will be based on coordination with the State Historic Preservation Office as appropriate and required, and with full consideration given to the proposed undertaking’s potential direct and indirect effects on historic properties within the Corps’ identified permit area.

TRIBAL RESOURCES:

Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act also requires federal agencies to consult with federally recognized American Indian tribes that attach religious and cultural significance to historic properties that may be affected by the agency’s undertaking. Corps Tribal Consultation Policy mandates an open, timely, meaningful, collaborative, and effective deliberative communication process that emphasizes trust, respect, and shared responsibility. The policy further emphasizes that, to the extent practicable and permitted by law, consultation works toward mutual consensus and begins at the earliest planning stages before decisions are made and actions taken. The Corps final eligibility and effect determination will be based on coordination with interested tribes, in accordance with the Corps current tribal standard operating procedures as appropriate and required, and with full consideration given to the proposed undertaking’s potential direct and indirect effects on tribal resources.

MODIFICATION OF CIVIL WORKS PROJECTS: 33 USC 408 (SECTION 408):

All Section 408 proposals will be coordinated internally at USACE. The Section 408 decision will be issued along with the Section 404 and/or Section 10 decision. Please see the following link for more information regarding Section 408: https://www.nab.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory/Section-408-Requests/.

WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION:

The applicant is required to obtain a water quality certification in accordance with Section 401 of the Clean Water Act.

COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS:

Where applicable, the applicant has certified in this application that the proposed activity complies with and will be conducted in a manner consistent with the approved Coastal Zone Management Program. By this public notice, we are requesting the state concurrence or objection to the applicant’s consistency statement.

The applicant must obtain any state or local government permits which may be required.

SUBMISSION OF COMMENTS:

The Corps of Engineers is soliciting comments from the public; federal, state, and local agencies and officials; Indian Tribes; and other interested parties in order to consider and evaluate the impacts of this proposed activity. Any comments received will be considered by the Corps of Engineers to determine whether to issue, modify, condition, or deny a permit for this proposal. To make this decision, comments are used to assess impacts on endangered species, historic properties, water quality, general environmental effects, and the other public interest factors listed above. Comments are used in the preparation of an Environmental Assessment and/or an Environmental Impact Statement pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act. Comments provided will become part of the public record for this action and are subject to release to the public through the Freedom of Information Act. Comments are also used to determine the need for a public hearing and to determine the overall public interest of the proposed activity.

Written comments concerning the work described above related to the factors listed above or other pertinent factors must be received by the United States Army Corps of Engineers, Baltimore District within the comment period specified above through postal mail at the address below or electronic submission to the project manager email address below. Written comments should reference the Application Number NAB-2022-60834-46.

PUBLIC HEARING REQUESTS:

Any person who has an interest which may be adversely affected by the issuance of this permit may request a public hearing. The request, which must be in writing, must be received within the comment period as specified above to receive consideration. Also, it must clearly set forth the interest which may be adversely affected by this activity and the manner in which the interest may be adversely affected. The public hearing request may be submitted by electronic mail or mailed to the following address:

Nicole Nasteff
Nicole.M.Voelker@usace.army.mil
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Baltimore District
Regulatory Branch
2 Hopkins Plaza
Baltimore, Maryland 21201

It is requested that you communicate this information concerning the proposed work to any persons known by you to be interested, who did not receive a copy of this notice.

General information regarding the Corps’ permitting process can be found on our website at https://www.nab.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory.aspx. This public notice has been prepared in accordance with Corps implementing regulations at 33 CFR 325.3. If you have any questions concerning this specific project, or would like to request a paper copy of this public notice, please contact Nicole Nasteff of this office, at (410) 962-1847 or via email at nicole.m.voelker@usace.army.mil. This public notice is issued by the Chief, Regulatory Branch.